|
With nearly 2,000 environmental firms
in the United States pursuing overseas business and export activities
and efforts of industry-specific export promotion in the federal
government and almost all of the 50 states, researchers at San
Francisco State University sought to assess levels of export
activity, critical success factors and barriers to exports. The
following is a summary of their survey results and findings from
a study of environmental firms in California.
The profile of the 55 exporting firms in
the survey sample shows them to be small and medium sized firms
(66% under $10 million revenue) which have been in business a
long time (67% over 10 years). They have a good deal of export
experience (60% exported for 4 or more years; 56% exported to
4 or more countries). While their level of export activity is
higher than the national average (58% earn more than 5% of their
annual revenue from exports), the export opportunities available
to this industry suggest there is much room for increasing Bay
Area exports from California. Asia was the largest market for
San Francisco Bay Area environmental firms in 1997.
Characterization of Environmental Exporters
in the Survey Set

Source: San Francisco State University,
College of Business Survey
Column total exceeds 100% because some firms use more than one
type of alliance.
What do environmental firms
believe to be the key success factors in exporting?
In order to explore this question,
firms were asked to rate the relative importance of 13 items
in relation to export success. These items were factor analyzed
to see if any themes emerged reflecting a consistent viewpoint
among firms in the industry. In priority order these are alliances,
understanding country markets, in-house staff and financing.
Having alliances and working effectively with partners in export
countries is considered to be the most critical success factor
for exporters. Understanding country markets, or becoming familiar
with a specific country, its culture, work habits, and language
is also considered to be very important for export success. Having
experienced in-house staff dedicated to exports was rated the
third most important factor. Access to financing for export activities
was the final important success factor.
A wide range of strategic alliances were
used in exporting by firms in our survey, as shown in the table
below. Joint ventures with small companies in export markets
was the most common form of alliance followed by long-term marketing
agreements. This may be due to the fact that the customer of
environmental technology products and services is often a local
or national government agency that requires local participation.
Moreover, the differences in legal, political and social environments
in most foreign countries also necessitates the knowledge and
connections of host country partners. Such alliances provide
immediate local presence and knowledge of the local market.
How satisfied exporting
firms were with their host country partner relationships?
Companies were asked to rate
their satisfaction with their host country partner as well as
the financial returns associated with the relationship (see table
on the facing page). The good news is that there are relatively
low levels of dissatisfaction-only 4% were dissatisfied with
the relationship in general and only 2% were dissatisfied with
the financial returns. A concern is that only about 44% of the
firms were satisfied or extremely satisfied. We need to better
understand why satisfaction levels were not higher, and help
firms better manage strategic alliances with host country partners.
Finally, results included the overall satisfaction
of export firms with their export experience. The final table
shows only about half the exporting firms in our sample were
satisfied or extremely satisfied with their export experience
and with the financial return from exports. This may be due to
the previous finding that satisfaction with host country partner
alliances for exports is low. Low satisfaction with host country
partner alliances can adversely affect satisfaction levels with
the overall export experience.
Level of Satisfaction with In-Country
Partners and Exports

IMPLICATIONS FOR COMPANIES AND GOVERNMENT
SUPPORT AGENCIES
The results of this study have implications
for three groups: environmental technology firms that have no
export experience, experienced exporters, and public sector service
organizations with an interest in providing export assistance
to environmental technology firms.
Firms without export experience have a
wide range of information needs in order to overcome the barriers
to exporting. Non-exporting firms want information about the
"ropes and procedures" associated with selling in foreign
markets, they are unsure as to where to find the best export
market opportunities, and they want to know more about the types
of export assistance that are available. For these firms, obtaining
relevant information can involve many blind alleys, and it can
be time consuming and costly.
Many of these firms may not realize that
there is a well equipped, broad based infrastructure of public
sector service organizations that can assist them in accessing
the information and resources they need. These barriers can be
directly addressed through informational sessions and programs.
Service providers to the environmental technology industry can
play a significant role here in moving these firms to export
readiness and to becoming exporters.
For experienced exporters a concern was
that close to 50% of the exporting firms felt either neutral
or dissatisfied about their export experience and associated
financial returns. These firms need to recognize from the outset
that effective host country partner alliances are critical to
their success and ultimate satisfaction with their export endeavors.
A number of visits over a period of time will probably have to
be made to a target country market to understand local markets,
customs and business practices, and especially to meet prospective
partners. Partner selection and the management of the alliance
relationship over time will play a major role in achieving success.
In new markets, exporting firms should seek assistance from public
sector service providers to assist them in networking and establishing
relationships with potential partners. Assessment of potential
partners should include an exploration of mutual expectations
regarding the working relationship. Effort and skill will have
to be put into building trust in these relationships.
This study indicates that public sector
service providers have a major role in assisting environmental
technology firms through their programs and activities. An important
but potentially overlooked service that can be provided by public
sector organizations is assisting firms in assessing their export
readiness. Public sector agencies can assess, diagnose and advise
firms accordingly. Such firms need to be screened out from taking
up further resources that need to be focused on export-ready
firms.
Public sector service providers should
help export-ready firms overcome external barriers such as a
lack of information about the 'ropes and procedures' associated
with selling in foreign markets, the types of export assistance
that are available, and where to find the best export market
opportunities. Valued information is available, but firms may
not know it is available or how to access it. It would be helpful
if there was a central location where firms could go with their
questions and information needs, and be directed to the appropriate
service providers or resources.
Another area where service providers can
play an important value added role relates to host country alliances.
Service providers can facilitate increased understanding of the
important role of these alliances, what it takes to make them
work effectively, and they can assist firms in the process of
finding appropriate partners. They can develop and maintain current
databases of potential partners in export markets and provide
training to export-ready firms to better select partners and
manage such alliances.
Research performed by Richard Castaldi,
Murray Silverman and Sanjit Sengupta, College of Business, San
Francisco State University, sengupta@sfsu.edu
|